Broke????

The biggest factor of why Seniors are losing more and more benefits. They are getting blamed for the country
going broke.

This has gone out to almost two million people .

It's easy to dismiss individual programs that benefit non-citizens until they're put together and this picture emerges. Someone did a lot of research to put together all
of this data. Often these programs are buried within other programs making them difficult to find.

A Real
Eye Opener


WHY is the USA BANKRUPT? Read this:

We have been hammered with the propaganda that it was the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.

I hope the following14 reasonsare forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the readers gets sick of reading them. I also have included the URL's for verification of all the following facts.

1.  $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare
To illegal aliens each year by state governments.

Verify At: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8
<http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8>
 2. $22 Billion dollars a year is spent on food
Assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free
school lunches for illegal aliens.
 Verify  At: http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML
<http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML>
 3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
 Verifyhttp://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML<http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.
 4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on
Primary and secondary school education for children here
illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!
 Verify  At:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt...0.HTML
<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt...0.HTML>



5.

$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for
Education for the American-born
Children of illegal aliens, known as
Anchor babies.

Verify  At http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>


 6.

$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate
illegal aliens.

Verify at:  http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML<http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML>


7.

30% percent of all Federal Prison
Inmates are illegal aliens.


Verify at:https://owa.slugger.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx
<https://owa.slugger.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx>



8.

$90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on
Illegal aliens for Welfare & social
Services by the American taxpayers.

Verify  At:
http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML
<http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML>



9.

$200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are
caused by the illegal Aliens.

Verify At:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI
<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI>


13.

In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to theirCountries of origin.


Verify At:.
<http://www/ <http://www/> /..rense..com/general75/niht.htm <http://rense.com/general75/niht.htm>


14.

The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:
Nearly One million sex crimes committed
By Illegal Immigrants In The United States .


Verify  At:
http:// www.drdsk.com/articleshtml
<http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml>



M

The total cost is a whopping


$ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME, HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00 WHICH
WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE
ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENSOF THIS
COUNTRY.

Are we THAT Stupid?

YES, FOR ALLOWING THOSE IN THE U.S.. CONGRESS TO GET AWAY WITH DOING THIS YEAR AFTER YEAR!!!!!



If this doesn't bother you, then just delete the message.

If, on the other hand, it does raise the hair on the back o f
your neck, I hope you forward it to every Legal Resident in the United
States!!!

























Reply, Reply All or Forward | More
Click to reply all
Send
         
Make yourself at home.

The Great Society

If the U.S. Gov. spent as much time, money and resources on solving our national debt, as it has on trying to implement the ACA., we would be on our way to solvency again. Five years of research, 20,000 pages of regulations Who wrote it? Unknown. Where was it written? Behind closed doors. For what purpose? To provide further entitlements. For whom? Those who cannot afford it. At what benefit? To increase the burden of those who can afford it. At what cost? Well over two trillion dollars. Does it work? Not yet. Why doesn’t it work? The websites are down. That’s it? It will work. When? We do not know. Will more money have to be sucked into this money pit? Yes. Why? So we can get it going. Why? To provide healthcare for the nation. Does the nation have healthcare now? Yes. How could we improve on something that is already working? Provide entitlement for the uninsurable and the needy. How?  By giving them healthcare. How? By taxing the working man, and fining those who don’t participate, and cutting the care for those who can afford it. Do we not already do that? Yes, we need to raise more money for the budget. Why? So congress can have a 35% raise each year. So we just impoverish the middle class? Yes. Why? So we can conceal a tax hike and give a community organizer something to do.

Obama, the Ventriloquist's Dummy

 Wall Street Journal Calls Obama a Dummy


A "deadly" article regarding Obama, at the Wall Street
Journal, which today is the most widely circulated newspaper in America.

Article from the Wall Street Journal - by Alan Caruba:
"I have this theory about Barack Obama. I think he's led a
kind of make-believe life in which money was provided and doors were opened
because at some point early on somebody or some group (George Soros anybody?)
took a look at this tall, good looking, half-white, half-black, young man with
an exotic African/Muslim name and concluded he could be guided toward a life in
politics where his facile speaking skills could even put him in the White
House.

In a very real way, he has been a young man in a very big hurry.
Who else do you know has written two memoirs before the age of 45? "Dreams
of My Father" was published in 1995 when he was only 34 years old. The
"Audacity of Hope" followed in 2006. If, indeed, he did write them himself.
There are some who think that his mentor and friend, Bill Ayers, a man who
calls himself a "communist with a small 'c'" was the real author.

His political skills consisted of rarely voting on anything that
might be deemed controversial. He went from a legislator in the Illinois
legislature to the Senator from that state because he had the good fortune of
having Mayor Daley's formidable political machine at his disposal.

He was in the U.S. Senate so briefly that his bid for the
presidency was either an act of astonishing self-confidence or part of some
greater game plan that had been determined before he first stepped foot in the
Capital. How, many must wonder, was he selected to be a 2004 keynote speaker at
the Democrat convention that nominated John Kerry when virtually no one had
ever even heard of him before?

He outmaneuvered Hillary Clinton in primaries. He took Iowa by
storm. A charming young man, an anomaly in the state with a very small black
population, he oozed "cool" in a place where agriculture was the
antithesis of cool. He dazzled the locals. And he had an army of volunteers
drawn to a charisma that hid any real substance.

And then he had the great good fortune of having the Republicans
select one of the most inept candidates for the presidency since Bob Dole. And
then John Mc Cain did something crazy. He picked Sarah Palin, an unknown female
governor from the very distant state of Alaska. It was a ticket that was
reminiscent of 1984's Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro and they went down
to defeat.

The mainstream political media fell in love with him. It was a
schoolgirl crush with febrile commentators like Chris Mathews swooning then and
now over the man. The venom directed against Mc Cain and, in particular, Palin,
was extraordinary.

Now, 5 full years into his presidency, all of those gilded years
leading up to the White House have left him unprepared to be President. Left to
his own instincts, he has a talent for saying the wrong thing at the wrong
time. It swiftly became a joke that he could not deliver even the briefest of
statements without the ever-present Tele-Prompters.

Far worse, however, is his capacity to want to "wish
away" some terrible realities, not the least of which is the Islamist
intention to destroy America and enslave the West. Any student of history knows
how swiftly Islam initially spread. It knocked on the doors of Europe, having
gained a foothold in Spain.

The great crowds that greeted him at home or on his campaign
"world tour" were no substitute for having even the slightest grasp
of history and the reality of a world filled with really bad people with really
bad intentions.

Oddly and perhaps even inevitably, his political experience, a
cakewalk, has positioned him to destroy the Democrat Party's hold on power in
Congress because in the end it was never about the Party. It was always about
his communist ideology, learned at an early age from family, mentors, college
professors, and extreme leftist friends and colleagues.

Obama is a man who could deliver a snap judgment about a Boston
police officer who arrested an "obstreperous" Harvard
professor-friend, but would warn Americans against "jumping to
conclusions" about a mass murderer at Fort Hood who shouted "Allahu
Akbar." The absurdity of that was lost on no one. He has since compounded
this by calling the Christmas bomber "an isolated extremist" only to
have to admit a day or two later that he was part of an al Qaeda plot.

He is a man who could strive to close down our detention facility
at Guantanamo even though those released were known to have returned to the
battlefield against America. He could even instruct his Attorney General to
afford the perpetrator of 9/11 a civil trial when no one else would ever even
consider such an obscenity. And he is a man who could wait three days before
having anything to say about the perpetrator of yet another terrorist attack on
Americans and then have to elaborate on his remarks the following day because his
first statement was so lame.

The pattern repeats itself. He either blames any problem on the
Bush administration or he naively seeks to wish away the truth.

Knock, knock. Anyone home? Anyone there? Barack Obama exists only
as the sock puppet of his handlers, of the people who have maneuvered and
manufactured this pathetic individual's life.

When anyone else would quickly and easily produce a birth
certificate, this man spent over a million dollars to deny access to his. Most
other documents, the paper trail we all leave in our wake, have been
sequestered from review. He has lived a make-believe life whose true facts
remain hidden.

We laugh at the ventriloquist's dummy, but what do you do when the
dummy is President of the United States

We get no “Merry Christmas” from our president

We get no “Merry Christmas”  from our president, But we are insulted with this, his nit wit comments about the Muslims.

On behalf of all American people, Michelle and I extend our best wishes to Muslim communities here in the United States and around the world on the beginning of the blessed month of Ramadan.

A time for self-reflection and devotion through prayer and fasting, Ramadan is also an occasion when Muslims around the world reaffirm their commitment to helping the less fortunate, including those struggling because of economic hardship and inequality.

Here in the United States, we are grateful to the many Muslim American organizations, individuals, and businesses that are devoted to creating opportunity for all by working to reduce income inequality and poverty, not only through their charitable efforts, but also through their initiatives to empower students, workers and families with the education, skills and health care they deserve.

 Ramadan also reminds us of our shared responsibility to treat others as we wish to be treated ourselves and the basic principles that bind people of different faiths together: a yearning for peace, justice, and equality. At a moment when too many people around the world continue to suffer from senseless conflict and violence, this sacred time reminds us of our common obligations to pursue justice and peace and to uphold the dignity of every human being.

As I’ve done every year as President, I look forward to welcoming Muslim Americans from across the United States to the White House for an iftar dinner. It will be another opportunity for me to convey America’s appreciation for the contributions of Muslim Americans to our country and to wish Muslims around the world a month blessed with the joys of family, community, peace and understanding.

Ramadan Kareem. ####

Please Stop Helping Us

Fred Siegel
The Poverty of Benevolence
Fifty years of the Great Society have made things worse for blacks, not better.
2 July 2014

Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make it Harder for Blacks to Succeed, by Jason Riley (Encounter Books, 205 pp., $23.99)
A half-century ago, the Great Society promised to complete the civil rights revolution by pulling African-Americans into the middle class. Today, a substantial black middle class exists, but its primary function has been, ironically, to provide custodial care to a black underclass—one ever more deeply mired in the pathologies of subsidized poverty. In Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make it Harder for Blacks to Succeed, Jason Riley, an editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal who grew up in Buffalo , New York , explains how poverty programs have succeeded politically by failing socially. “Today,” writes Riley, “more than 70 percent of black children are born to unwed mothers. Only 16 percent of black households are married couples with children, the lowest of any racial group in the United States .” Riley attributes the breakdown of the black family to the perverse effects of government social programs, which have created what journalist William Tucker calls “state polygamy.” As depicted in an idyllic 2012 Obama campaign cartoon, “The Life of Julia,” a lifelong relationship with the state offers the sustenance usually provided by two parents in most middle-class families.
Riley’s own life experience gives him powerful perspective from which to address these issues. His parents divorced but both remained attentive to him and his two sisters. His sisters, however, were drawn into the sex-and-drug pleasures of inner-city “culture.” By the time he graduated from high school, his older sister was a single mother. By the time he graduated from college, his younger sister had died from a drug overdose. Riley’s nine-year-old niece teased him for “acting white.” “Why you talk white, Uncle Jason?” she wanted to know. She couldn't understand why he was “trying to sound so smart.” His black public school teacher similarly mocked his standard English in front of the class. “The reality was,” Riley explains, “that if you were a bookish black kid who placed shared sensibilities above skin color, you probably had a lot of white friends.”
The compulsory “benevolence” of the welfare state, borne of the supposed expertise of sociologists and social planners, undermined the opportunities opened up by the end of segregation. The great hopes placed in education as a path to the middle class were waylaid by the virulence of a ghetto culture nurtured by family breakdown. Adjusted for inflation, federal per-pupil school spending grew 375 percent from 1970 to 2005, but the achievement gap between white and black students remained unchanged. Students at historically black colleges and universities, explained opinion columnist Bill Maxwell, “did not know what or whom to respect. For many, the rappers Bow Wow and 50 Cent were as important to black achievement as the late Ralph Bunche, the first black to win a Nobel Peace Prize, and Zora Neale Hurston, the great novelist.”
“Why study hard in school,” asks Riley, “if you will be held to a lower academic standard? Why change antisocial behavior when people are willing to reward it, make excuses for it, or even change the law to accommodate it?”
In the 50 years since the start of the Great Society and the expenditure of more than$20 trillion to alleviate poverty, millions of newcomers have entered America from Asia and from Africa . They generally arrived in poverty and have improved themselves by dint of self-help and hard work—those boring middle-class values that President Obama’s mentor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, denounced so strenuously. But if, as Riley demonstrates, the Great Society programs have failed in conventional terms, they have been an overwhelming political success. Together, government workers and the recipients of government benefits make up a formidable voting bloc. Yet their very political success may also prove their undoing: President Obama’s share of the African-American vote increased between 2008 and 2012, but during that period, blacks’ share of the national income declined and their unemployment rate increased.
“Everybody has asked the question,” Frederick Douglass said in an 1865 speech, “‘What should we do with the Negro?’ I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall. . . . And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs!” A century and a half later, Jason Riley echoes that advice.
Fred Siegel is a City Journal contributing editor and the author of The Revolt Against the Masses.

POLITICAL SUCCESS IS WHAT?

Subject: Cochran. Our key to success.

Brief autopsy regarding last weeks disappointing elections results.


A group of establishment republicans is trying to organize candidates to unseat TEA Party members such as Cruz, Lee, Paul, and all the rest.  We think the time is right to get rid of those nasty supporters of the constitution, Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, liberty, freedom, free speech, freedom of religion and all of those other outdated, passé dusty old traditions.  Just think, it's not only lefty democrats and the media fighting to get rid of the right wingers, we've now got all those magnificent RINOs workings for us.  I know it's hard to believe but we have republicans who are so focused on "numbers" rather than saving the country that we're almost assured of a landslide victory.   This skirmish shouldn't take more than a month of two.

You may be wondering who we're going to run against these right wing incumbents.  Well, as luck would have it we've found several old retired bureaucrats (past 70) who are still able to tie their shoes and eat without slobbering...at least not very much.  We've also already got pledges of support from McCain, Lindsay, McConnell, Boehner, Chris Matthews, Harry Reid, Carl Rove, Barney Sanders and several other patriotic socialists.

We owe this brilliant idea to Thad Cochran of Mississippi.  He proved that with the RINOs, the Marxist media, (the propaganda wing of the democrat party), the millennials, the "victimized minorities" and the Xers, willing to fight for us for free, how can we lose.  Before you know it the democracy we've come to hate will be replaced by a fair and equitable form of socialism that only we elitists can run effectively.  Only we can hold all the power in our hands without going down the drain like all the other socialist nations have done.  It'll be utopia!

I hope we can count on you for your generous support.  Just mail your contributions to:   "Bye Freedom!" at #38871006, US Federal Corrections, Leavenworth KS.

2008 Election of Barack Obama

The liberal Newsweek Magazine is going out of business but not before it attacks the President. Wonderful story!


Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal media...

By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist - Opinion Writer)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no documentation for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in history.

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly? In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.